In a surprising twist within the boxing world, Ring Magazine has announced two co-feature bouts set for July 12th in New York City: Edgar Berlanga will take on Hamzah Sheeraz, while Shakur Stevenson faces off against William Zepeda. The narrative surrounding these fights is particularly intriguing, as it presents a departure from conventional event structure which could leave fans scratching their heads. Rather than having a single main event, both bouts are touted as co-main attractions, but the strategy behind the hierarchy on fight night seems muddled.
The announcement indicates that while the Stevenson-Zepeda bout will be treated as the “main event” leading up to the fight, Berlanga and Sheeraz will take center stage on fight night. This inversion of expectations raises questions about how promotional decisions are made and what audience engagement strategies are truly effective. Boxing fans typically relish a well-defined hierarchy in fights, where they can clearly discern which matchup holds greater weight. It’s perplexing to think about the value that Ring Magazine attributes to this marketing strategy, especially when the chosen headliner consists of two fighters who have yet to achieve significant acclaim in the sport.
Marketability vs. Talent
Edgar Berlanga (23-1, 18 KOs) and Hamzah Sheeraz (21-0-1, 17 KOs) are not without their fanbases but are often viewed through the lens of being overhyped or even “manufactured” for the market. Neither has a truly eye-catching resume that would inspire confidence among serious boxing aficionados. In more ways than one, they resemble avatars of promotion more than authentic pugilistic prowess. Shakur Stevenson, with an impressive track record, undoubtedly possesses the star power to draw in viewers. He arguably deserves the status of the main event based on talent alone.
While the promotional teams may believe that elevating Stevenson-Zepeda will entice a larger audience to purchase the pay-per-view event on DAZN, the decision to upstage this with Berlanga-Sheeraz as the headlining fight certainly risks alienating more discerning fans. The risk taken appears to hinge on the assumption that casual fans may overlook the implications of a co-main setup. Such a gamble can misfire spectacularly, as boxing fans are increasingly savvy about their preferred fighters and sometimes reject promotional intricacies that seem disingenuous.
Public Sentiment and Fan Reactions
Public sentiment around Berlanga and Sheeraz is telling. Many boxing enthusiasts express a reluctance to engage with these fighters, seeing them as lacking the competitive edge present in more experienced boxers on the card. If this event is aimed primarily at generating revenue, the discontent might eventually result in dwindling PPV sales. The juxtaposition of actual boxing lore and carefully crafted promotional narratives seldom resonates well in arenas filled with ardent fight fans who want authenticity.
This conundrum leaves an essential question unanswered: What is the long-term impact of such promotional choices on the sport? If fan anticipation is based on illusion rather than reality, boxing’s allure could wane, leading to a disconnect between fans and promotions. In a sport where respect and legacy matter deeply, the current marketing strategy may ultimately confuse and frustrate a loyal audience more than it entices new ones.
Leave a Reply