Arsenal recently made headlines with their loan signings of Raheem Sterling from Chelsea and Neto from Bournemouth. While these signings may seem like a positive move for the club at first glance, upon closer examination, there are several factors to consider.
One of the key points to address is Raheem Sterling’s recent performance on the field. Sterling, who has three years left on his contract with Chelsea, was deemed surplus to requirements at Stamford Bridge before making the move to Arsenal. This raises questions about his current form and whether he will be able to make a significant impact at Arsenal.
The fact that Arsenal had previously been linked with Manchester United’s Jadon Sancho and Bayern Munich’s Kingsley Coman, but settled for Sterling instead, may indicate a lack of success in their transfer strategy. With other top clubs securing high-profile signings, Arsenal’s decision to bring in Sterling on loan raises concerns about their ability to attract top talent.
Additionally, Arsenal’s decision to bring in Neto from Bournemouth as a backup goalkeeper raises questions about their defensive stability. While Neto may provide valuable experience as a backup for David Raya, the decision to loan out Aaron Ramsdale to Southampton for up to £25 million could leave Arsenal vulnerable in the goalkeeping department.
While Arsenal’s loan signings of Raheem Sterling and Neto may appear to address certain needs within the squad, there are underlying concerns that must be addressed. From questions about Sterling’s form and impact on the team to doubts about Arsenal’s transfer strategy and defensive stability, the club must carefully assess their decisions to ensure success in the upcoming season.
Leave a Reply